Talk:Electric light

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electric light article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Electrical engineering Top‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I believe that talking about the history of ELECTRIC LIGHT without mentioning Edison's contribution is a huge mistake. 189.6.241.78 (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --MrClog (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done: I added a mention of Edison in the paragraph on early history. You may be interested in the article Incandescent light bulb, which has a much fuller exposition of the history of this technology.--Srleffler (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remove circuit symbols section

@Srleffler:, @זור987:, @Gusfriend:, @Wtshymanski: The "Circuit symbols" section is not really deserving of a main section. It has some merit but not fit into any of the other sections. With the addition of the "Electronic symbol" section of the new infobox, I think the "Circuit symbols" section should be removed. This will allow editors and readers to have greater focus on the cultural symbolism section, which should be expanded, and the history section, which could use some restructuring – Kjerish (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) SnowFire (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Electric light → Electric lamp – Article is about a lamp (the device), not about light (the phenomenon); significant source of confusion. Kehkou (talk) 22:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Kehkou (talk) 02:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. That doesn't really make sense. To the extent that one can talk about a phenomenon of "electric light", it would be just the light that is produced by the device, an electric light. That phenomenon would be correctly covered in this article. You assert that this is a "significant source of confusion", but you haven't really given any evidence of that nor said anything that makes me think that you are even remotely likely to be correct.

On the other hand, confusion over electric light (the device) and electric light (the phenomenon) is nothing compared to confusion over electric lamp (the thing that sits on a table) and electric lamp (the element that produces light). In much of the English-speaking world, it is not typical to refer to a light bulb as a "lamp", and using that term for it is genuinely confusing.--Srleffler (talk) 03:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Light" is the 'stuff' that comes out of a lamp; the 'stuff' you "turn on".

A "lamp" is any device intended to produce light and can be electric, gas, etc., and not necessarily visible (i.e., infrared lamp). Such devices produce electric light, gas light, candle light, etc.

The device that holds the lamp (such as a table lamp) is called a "luminaire" or "fixture".

Hope that clears it up. I live in the English-speaking USA, and very regularly refer to them as "lamps". I've seen the individual LEDs in an LED lamp refered to as "wicks", but that's just silly. Kehkou (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose while some people might refer to it as a lamp, the vast majority refer to a device which generates light using electricity as an "electric light". Apart from the OP, who is confused about this? Polyamorph (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A lamp is a subcase of the more general case, electric light – Kjerish (talk) 04:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Close The consensus is quite clear; please close this request.

Incidentally, "light" is also a device used to start a fire, the act of using said device, the opposite of heavy, and a lesser than normal amount or magnitude.Kehkou (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carariney (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Middle east association is not credible

I've looked into this and there are no reliable sources that back this section, please remove it. 72.83.41.123 (talk) 11:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. The source cited was reported to have failed verification back in April, and no further sources have been provided for the statement.--Srleffler (talk) 20:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]